Why your Framework roll-out might not be all too SAFe?
SAFe (Scaled Agile Framework) is a popular framework for implementing agile practices at scale. However, there are some potential disadvantages to rolling out SAFe that should be considered:
- Complexity: SAFe is a complex framework that requires significant effort and resources to implement. It involves many roles, practices, and artifacts, and can be difficult to understand and implement without proper training and support.
- Resistance to Change: Rolling out SAFe can be a significant change for an organization, and may meet resistance from stakeholders who are comfortable with the status quo. This can make it challenging to gain buy-in and adoption across the organization.
- Lack of Customization: While SAFe offers a robust framework for implementing agile practices at scale, it may not be a perfect fit for every organization. Some companies may find that certain aspects of the framework don’t align with their unique needs and processes, which can make it challenging to customize and implement.
- Focus on Process Over Outcomes: SAFe is primarily focused on process, which can lead to a “checkbox” mentality, where teams focus more on following the framework than on delivering value to customers. This can lead to a lack of focus on outcomes and customer satisfaction.
- Cost: Implementing SAFe can be costly, requiring significant investment in training, coaching, and tooling. This can be a barrier for some organizations, particularly smaller ones with limited resources.
SAFe can be an effective framework for implementing agile practices at scale, but it’s important to carefully consider the potential disadvantages before deciding to roll it out in your organization.
Reach out to to find consultants that help you to assess the advantages of SAFe for your organization.
